• Profile
Close

Transplant conditioning with treosulfan/fludarabine with or without TBI. A randomized phase II trial in patients with MDS and AML

Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation Jan 06, 2018

Deeg HJ, et al. - Researchers designed this prospective randomized phase II “pick the winner” trial to assess the efficacy of transplant conditioning with treosulfan/fludarabine ± 2 Gy total body irradiation (TBI) in reducing post-transplant relapse in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (MDS/CMML) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Here, in high-risk patients up to 70 years of age, treosulfan/fludarabine/low-dose TBI provided effective conditioning for allogeneic HCT. Patients with AML demonstrated more profound effect with the addition of TBI than those with MDS. A lower overall success rate was observed in association with high-risk disease features.

  • Researchers assessed the efficacy in 100 patients [2–70 (median 57) years of age], with myelodysplastic syndrome/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (MDS/CMML; n=51) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML; n=49).
  • Patients were administered intravenous (IV) treosulfan, 14 g/m2/day on days -6 to -4 and IV fludarabine, 30 mg/m2/day on days -6 to -2, alone or combined with 2 Gy TBI (day 0).
  • Related (n= 43) or unrelated (n=57) donors were observed.  
  • All subsequent patients received TBI, when a planned interim analysis demonstrated superior PFS in the TBI arm (p=0.04).
  • The 1-year overall survival (OS) was 80% for the TBI arm and 69% for the non-TBI arm with a follow-up of 12–40 (median 20) months.
  • Findings revealed the 1-year cumulative relapse incidence of 22% and 34%, respectively (p=0.06).
  • The 1-year relapse incidence was 15% and 31% (p=0.20) among patients with low risk disease, and 26% and 36% (p=0.18), respectively for patients with high-risk disease .
  • The 1-year relapse incidence was 27% vs 33% (p=0.49) among MDS patients, and 16% vs 35% (p=0.05) among AML patients.
  • Patients with unfavorable cytogenetics indicated the largest difference, with 1-year relapse incidences of 31% and 63% (p=0.18), respectively.
  • In this high risk patient population, non-relapse mortality was 9% at 6 months and did not differ between arms.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay