Ticagrelor vs prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention - analysis from the Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey (ACSIS)
Cardiology Nov 26, 2021
Eliaz R, Mengesha B, Ovdat T, et al. - Treatment with prasugrel, vs ticagrelor, results in superior clinical outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, but not in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients.
This study included ACS (acute coronary syndrome) patients undergoing in-hospital percutaneous coronary intervention, enrolled in the ACSIS (Acute Coronary Syndrome Israeli Survey), and treated with prasugrel (n=1126) or ticagrelor (n=817).
No significant difference in in-hospital complication rates was found between groups.
In propensity score matched STEMI patients, higher 30-day re-hospitalization rate, 30-day MACE (the composite of death, MI, stroke and urgent revascularization), and 1-year mortality rates were noted in the ticagrelor group vs the prasugrel group.
In NSTE-ACS patients, there was no link between drug choice and outcomes.
Cox regression analysis applied on the entire cohort revealed lower 1-year mortality with prasugrel in STEMI patients but not in NSTE-ACS patients (p for interaction 0.03).
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries