The validity of central venous to arterial carbon dioxide difference to predict adequate fluid management during living donor liver transplantation. A prospective observational study
BMC Anesthesiology Jun 28, 2019
ELAyashy M, et al. - Researchers sought to determine the value of central and pulmonary veno-arterial CO2 gradients in prognosticating fluid responsiveness and in guiding fluid management during liver transplantation. Based on pulse pressure variations (PPV), intraoperative fluid management was done in adult recipients (ASA III to IV) scheduled for liver transplantation. PPV of ≥15% (Fluid Responding Status-FRS) was suggestive of fluid resuscitation with 250 ml albumin 5% boluses; this was repeated as required to restore PPV to < 15% (Fluid non-Responding Status-FnRS). They calculated central venous to arterial CO2 gap [C(v-a) CO2 gap] and pulmonary venous to arterial CO2 gap [Pulm(p-a) CO2 gap] in simultaneous blood samples from central venous and pulmonary artery catheters (PAC). In addition, they measured CO and lactate. Record of 67 data points was made (20 FRS and 47 FnRS). Findings provide no support for the utility of central and the pulmonary CO2 gaps as tools for predicting fluid responsiveness or to guide fluid management during liver transplantation. Also, CO2 gaps did not show good correlation with the changes in PPV or CO.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries