• Profile
Close

The performance of non-invasive tests to rule-in and rule-out significant coronary artery stenosis in patients with stable angina: A meta-analysis focused on post-test disease probability

European Heart Journal Jun 06, 2018

Knuuti J, et al. - The authors wanted to establish the ranges of pre-test probability (PTP) of coronary artery disease (CAD) in which stress electrocardiogram (ECG), stress echocardiography, coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can reclassify patients into a post-test probability that defines (>85%) or excludes (<15%) anatomically (defined by visual evaluation of invasive coronary angiography [ICA]) and functionally (defined by a fractional flow reserve [FFR] ≤0.8) significant CAD. For the detection of anatomically and functionally significant CAD, the various diagnostic modalities demonstrated different optimal performance ranges. For any given patient, they recommend selecting a diagnostic technique to rule-in or rule-out CAD based on the optimal PTP range for each test and on the presumed reference standard.

Methods

  • Researchers performed a broad search in electronic databases until August 2017.
  • They included studies on the aforementioned techniques in >100 patients with stable CAD that used either ICA or ICA with FFR measurement as reference.
  • Using a hierarchical bivariate random-effects model, study-level data was pooled and likelihood ratios for each technique were attained.
  • The PTP ranges were defined for each technique to rule-in or rule-out significant CAD.

Results

  • Analysis of a total of 28,664 patients from 132 studies that used ICA as reference and 4,131 from 23 studies using FFR, was performed.
  • Anatomically significant CAD can be ruled-in and ruled-out with stress ECG only when PTP is ≥80% (76–83) and ≤19% (15–25), respectively.
  • Anatomic CAD was ruled-in with coronary computed tomography angiography at a PTP ≥58% (45–70) and rule-out at a PTP ≤80% (65–94).
  • For functionally significant CAD, the corresponding PTP values were ≥75% (67–83) and ≤57% (40–72) for CCTA, and ≥71% (59–81) and ≤27 (24–31) for ICA, demonstrating its poorer performance of anatomic imaging against FFR.
  • In contrast, PET, stress CMR, and SPECT were able to rule-in functionally significant CAD when PTP is ≥46–59% and rule-out when PTP is ≤34–57%.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay