The impact of underinsurance on bladder cancer diagnosis, survival, and care delivery for individuals under the age of 65 years
Cancer Jan 29, 2020
Fletcher SA, Cole AP, Lu C, et al. - Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registry and the National Cancer Data Base, researchers analyzed people younger than 65 years who received a diagnosis of bladder cancer from 2007 to 2014, to determine the influence of a patient's insurance status (privately insured, insured by Medicaid, or uninsured) on the outcomes [diagnosis with advanced disease, cancer-specific survival, delay in treatment longer than 90 days, treatment in a high-volume hospital, and receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy] in bladder cancer, given health insurance remains a key mediator of healthcare disparities. The likelihood of receiving a diagnosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer was nearly twice among uninsured and Medicaid-insured people vs those with private insurance. For uninsured and Medicaid-insured people vs the privately insured, delays in treatment longer than 90 days were more likely. Overall, worse prognoses and poorer care quality were reported among uninsured and Medicaid-insured people vs privately insured people. A decreased burden of this disease may be ensured by extending high-quality insurance coverage to marginalized populations.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries