• Profile
Close

Tafenoquine vs primaquine to prevent relapse of Plasmodium vivax malaria

New England Journal of Medicine Jan 22, 2019

Llanos-Cuentas A, et al. - Among subjects with normal glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) enzyme activity, investigators examined the comparative efficiency of tafenoquine and primaquine for the radical cure of Plasmodium vivax malaria. They observed tafenoquine more effective for the radical cure of P. vivax malaria although, no significant difference in hemoglobin level reduction between tafenoquine and primaquine administered groups was noticed.

Methods

  • A phase 3, prospective, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, controlled trial was conducted to assess the comparative efficiency and safety of tafenoquine with primaquine.
  • They included subjects with normal glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) enzyme activity (female candidates with moderate G6PD enzyme deficiency) and confirmed P. vivax parasitemia in the trial conducted at 7 hospitals or clinics in Peru, Brazil, Colombia, Vietnam, and Thailand.
  • They categorized the candidates in a 2:1 ratio, to receive a single 300-mg dose of tafenoquine or 15 mg of primaquine once daily for 14 days (administered under supervision).
  • All individuals were given a 3-day course of chloroquine and were followed for 180 days.
  • A protocol-defined decline in the hemoglobin level (>3.0 g per deciliter or ≥30% from baseline or to a level of <6.0 g per deciliter) was considered as the primary safety outcome.
  • They used an odds ratio for recurrence of 1.45 (tafenoquine vs primaquine) as a noninferiority margin whereas freedom from recurrence of P. vivax parasitemia at 6 months was the primary efficiency outcome in a planned patient-level meta-analysis of this trial and another phase 3 trial of tafenoquine and primaquine (per-protocol populations).

Results

  • For a between-group difference of 1.2 percentage points (95% CI, −4.2 to 5.0), they observed a protocol-defined decline in the hemoglobin level took place in 4 of 166 subjects (2.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9 to 6.0) in the tafenoquine group and in 1 of 85 candidates (1.2%; 95% CI, 0.2 to 6.4) in the primaquine group.
  • They noticed 67.0% (95% CI, 61.0 to 72.3) among 426 candidates in tafenoquine group and 72.8% (95% CI, 65.6 to 78.8) among 214 subjects in primaquine group were free from recurrence at 6 months.
  • They did not found the efficiency of tafenoquine to be noninferior to that of primaquine (odds ratio for recurrence, 1.81; 95% CI, 0.82 to 3.96).

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay