Systematic review with meta‐analysis: The appropriateness of colonoscopy increases the probability of relevant findings and cancer while reducing unnecessary exams
Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics Nov 12, 2020
Frazzoni L, La Marca M, Radaelli F, et al. - By performing a systematic review, researchers sought to determine the impact of colonoscopy appropriateness in terms of producing additional diagnoses and sparing unnecessary exams. They included 21 studies (19,822 patients) for this analysis. In 15,162 (71%) patients, colonoscopy was appropriate. Appropriateness was correlated with significantly greater chances of relevant findings (34% vs 18%), CRC (7% vs 2%) and IBD (6% vs 4%). Per 100 patients, on average, colonoscopy with appropriate indication discovers 15 more relevant findings, five more CRCs and three more diagnoses of IBD. They suggest appropriateness criteria as valuable, although it is combined with clinical evaluation of the patient.
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries