• Profile
Close

Systematic review with meta‐analysis: The appropriateness of colonoscopy increases the probability of relevant findings and cancer while reducing unnecessary exams

Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics Nov 12, 2020

Frazzoni L, La Marca M, Radaelli F, et al. - By performing a systematic review, researchers sought to determine the impact of colonoscopy appropriateness in terms of producing additional diagnoses and sparing unnecessary exams. They included 21 studies (19,822 patients) for this analysis. In 15,162 (71%) patients, colonoscopy was appropriate. Appropriateness was correlated with significantly greater chances of relevant findings (34% vs 18%), CRC (7% vs 2%) and IBD (6% vs 4%). Per 100 patients, on average, colonoscopy with appropriate indication discovers 15 more relevant findings, five more CRCs and three more diagnoses of IBD. They suggest appropriateness criteria as valuable, although it is combined with clinical evaluation of the patient.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay