• Profile
Close

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the use of photon-based stereotactic radiosurgery vs fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of uveal melanoma

American Journal of Clinical Oncology Dec 23, 2020

Kosydar S, Robertson JC, Woodfin M, et al. - Researchers compared photon-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) vs fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) for the treatment of uveal melanoma, focusing on efficacy and adverse event profile. They performed a meta-analysis including 24 articles with a total of 1,745 patients identified from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and 2 Cochrane databases. Incidence proportions of local control, enucleation, metastatic progression, disease-specific, and overall death were the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included treatment-associated toxicities such as incidence proportions of radiation retinopathy, neovascular glaucoma, optic neuropathy, and cataract formation. For all primary, secondary and 5-year outcome measures, including local control, enucleation, and neovascular glaucoma, experts found no statistically significant disparities between photon-based fSRT and SRS. Overall, tumor control, survival and toxicities, as defined herein, did not differ between SRS and fSRT for uveal melanoma. In this analysis of novel management modalities deployed in rare tumors, confounding biases continue to be an expected limitation.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay