• Profile
Close

Six-month outcomes after restrictive or liberal transfusion for cardiac surgery

New England Journal of Medicine Aug 31, 2018

Mazer CD, et al. - Considering that a restrictive transfusion strategy as noninferior to a liberal strategy with respect to the composite outcome of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis by hospital discharge or 28 days after surgery, whichever came first among patients undergoing cardiac surgery who were at moderate-to-high risk for death, researchers presented the clinical outcomes at 6 months after surgery. Findings support the noninferiority of restrictive strategy for red-cell transfusion to a liberal strategy with respect to the composite outcome of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis at 6 months after surgery among these patients.

Methods

  • Researchers performed random assignment of 5243 adults undergoing cardiac surgery to a restrictive red-cell transfusion strategy (transfusion if the hemoglobin concentration was <7.5 g per deciliter intraoperatively or postoperatively) or a liberal red-cell transfusion strategy (transfusion if the hemoglobin concentration was <9.5 g per deciliter intraoperatively or postoperatively when the patient was in the intensive care unit [ICU] or was <8.5 g per deciliter when the patient was in the non-ICU ward).
  • Death from any cause, myocardial infarction, stroke, or new-onset renal failure with dialysis occurring within 6 months after the initial surgery were assessed as the primary composite outcomes.
  • All the components of the primary outcome as well as Emergency Department visit, hospital readmission, or coronary revascularization occurring within 6 months after the index surgery were included in the expanded secondary composite outcomes.
  • The individual components of the two composite outcomes were included as the secondary outcomes.

Results

  • The primary composite outcome were noted in 402 of 2317 patients (17.4%) in the restrictive-threshold group and in 402 of 2347 patients (17.1%) in the liberal-threshold group at 6 months after surgery (absolute risk difference before rounding, 0.22 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], −1.95 to 2.39; odds ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.18; P=0.006 for noninferiority).
  • The restrictive-threshold group had mortality of 6.2% vs 6.4% in the liberal-threshold group (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.21).
  • The groups were not significantly different in terms of the secondary outcomes.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay