• Profile
Close

Single-dose oral ciprofloxacin prophylaxis as a response to a meningococcal meningitis epidemic in the African meningitis belt: A 3-arm, open-label, cluster-randomized trial

PLoS Medicine Jul 12, 2018

Coldiron ME, et al. - Authors evaluated the efficacy of single-dose oral ciprofloxacin administered to household contacts and in village-wide distributions on the overall attack rate (AR) in an outbreak of meningococcal meningitis. Overall meningitis AR was reduced by the village-wide distribution of single-dose oral ciprofloxacin within 72 hours of case notification. In future meningitis outbreak responses, distributions of ciprofloxacin could be an effective tool.

Methods

  • Experts, in this 3-arm, open-label, cluster-randomized trial during a meningococcal meningitis outbreak in Madarounfa District, Niger, villages notifying a suspected case were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to standard care (the control arm), single-dose oral ciprofloxacin for household contacts within 24 hours of case notification, or village-wide distribution of ciprofloxacin within 72 hours of first case notification.
  • The overall AR of suspected meningitis after inclusion was the primary outcome.
  • They enrolled a random sample of 20 participating villages to document any changes in fecal carriage prevalence of ciprofloxacin-resistant and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacteriaceae before and after the intervention.
  • They included 49 villeges between April 22 and May 18, 2017: 17 to the control arm, 17 to household prophylaxis, and 15 to village-wide prophylaxis.

Results

  • As per the data, a total of 248 cases were notified in the study after the index cases.
  • Findings suggested that the AR in the control arm was 451 per 100,000 persons, 386 per 100,000 persons in the household prophylaxis arm (t test vs control p= 0.68), and 190 per 100,000 persons in the village-wide prophylaxis arm (t test vs control p=0.032).
  • Results demonstrated that the adjusted AR ratio between the household prophylaxis arm and the control arm was 0.94 (95% CI 0.52–1.73,p=0.85), and the adjusted AR ratio between the village-wide prophylaxis arm and the control arm was 0.40 (95% CI 0.19–0.87,p=0.022).
  • They did not notified any adverse events.
  • Data suggested that baseline carriage prevalence of ciprofloxacin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae was 95% and of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae was >90%, and did not change post-intervention.
  • Researchers found that the small number of cerebrospinal fluid samples sent for confirmatory testing was 1 limitation of the study.

Full text available Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay