Resumption of oral anticoagulation following traumatic injury and risk of stroke and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: A nationwide cohort study
European Heart Journal Nov 23, 2017
Staerk L, et al. - In this Danish nationwide registry-based study, including oral anticoagulant (OAC)-treated atrial fibrillation (AF) patients experiencing traumatic injury, the risks of all-cause mortality, stroke, major bleeding, and recurrent traumatic injury were assessed in association with resumption of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and non-VKAs oral anticoagulants (NOACs) following traumatic injury. Post-injury resumption of VKA and NOAC treatment resulted in lower hazard of all-cause mortality and ischaemic stroke, increased hazard of major bleeding but without additional hazards of recurrent traumatic injury. As per observations, withholding OAC following a traumatic injury in AF patients may not be warranted.
Methods
- This Danish nationwide registry-based study (2005Â16) was performed on a total of 4541 oral anticoagulant (OAC)-treated AF patients experiencing traumatic injury (defined as traumatic brain injury, hip fracture, or traumatic torso or abdominal injury).
Results
- Data demonstrated that within 90 days following discharge from traumatic injury, 60.6% resumed VKA (median age = 80, CHA2DS2-VASc = 4, HAS-BLED = 2), 16.7% resumed NOAC (median age = 81, CHA2DS2-VASc = 4, HAS-BLED = 2), and 22.7% did not resume OAC treatment (median age = 81, CHA2DS2-VASc = 4, HAS-BLED = 3).
- Among 9.5%, switch from VKA to NOAC was reported.
- Since 2009, an increase was documented in the trend in OAC resumption (P-value <0.0001), in particular with NOACs (P-value <0.0001).
- According to data, follow-up started 90 days after discharge, and comparisons were performed using time-varying multiple Cox regression analyses.
- Researchers found that VKA and NOAC resumption vs non-resumption were related to lower hazard [95% confidence interval (CI)] of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 0.48 (0.42Â0.53) and HR 0.55 (0.47Â0.66), respectively] and ischaemic stroke [HR 0.56 (0.43Â0.72) and HR 0.54 (0.35Â0.82), respectively], increased major bleeding hazard [HR 1.30 (1.03Â1.64) and HR 1.15 (0.81Â1.63), respectively], and similar hazard of recurrent traumatic injury [HR 0.93 (0.73Â1.18) and HR 0.87 (0.60Â1.27), respectively].
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries