• Profile
Close

Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) monotherapy in Asian patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: The TERRA Study

Journal of Clinical Oncology Feb 02, 2018

Xu J, et al. - In a phase II Japanese trial, trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) showed efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Researchers undertook this regional trial to assess the efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil in Asian patients with mCRC with or without exposure to biologic therapy. They found that regardless of exposure to biologic therapy, trifluridine/tipiracil vs placebo afforded a statistically significant survival benefit in Asian patients with mCRC refractory or intolerant to standard chemotherapies. Regarding safety profile, the results were similar to previous reports.

Methods
  • Researchers performed this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial at 30 sites in China, the Republic of Korea, and Thailand.
  • This study included patients ≥ 18 years old with histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum and known KRAS status who were refractory or intolerant to two or more prior chemotherapy regimens.
  • Random allocation of eligible patients (2:1 ratio; minimization method) to receive trifluridine/tipiracil (twice per day orally; 5 days on and 2 days off for 2 weeks, followed by 14 days off per cycle) or placebo, was done.
  • Overall survival (intent-to-treat population) was the primary end point.

Results
  • A total of 406 patients were randomly assigned to receive trifluridine/tipiracil (n = 271) or placebo (n = 135) between October 16, 2013, and June 15, 2015.
  • Researchers found significantly lower risk of death in the trifluridine/tipiracil arm as compared with the placebo arm (hazard ratio for death, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.99; log-rank P=.035).
  • They noted that in the trifluridine/tipiracil vs in the placebo arm, median overall survival was significantly longer (7.8 months [95% CI, 7.1 to 8.8 months] v 7.1 months [95% CI, 5.9 to 8.2 months], respectively), for a median survival follow-up time of 13.8 months (95% CI, 13.1 to 15.3 months) compared with 13.4 months (95% CI, 11.6 to 17.3 months), respectively.
  • Findings demonstrated similar incidence of serious adverse events between the arms (trifluridine/tipiracil, n = 63 [23.2%]; placebo, n = 32 [23.7%]).
  • In addition, no treatment-related deaths were reported.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay