• Profile
Close

Remnant liver ischemia and survival after colorectal liver metastasis resection

JAMA Surgery Oct 25, 2017

Yamashita S, et al. - The goal of this investigation was to examine the prognostic impact of remnant liver ischemia (RLI) following resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLMs) and to identify correlates of greater extent of RLI. Findings demonstrated the association of remnant liver ischemia grade 2 or higher with worse cancer-specific survival (CSS) post- resection and therefore, it was crucial to perform high-quality anatomic surgery in order to minimize RLI after resection.

Methods

  • Based on prospectively collected data, this retrospective analysis was conducted at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
  • A total of 202 patients were identified who underwent curative resection of CLMs between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2014, and had enhanced computed tomographic images obtained within 30 postoperative days.
  • Remnant liver ischemia was defined as reduced or absent contrast enhancement during the portal phase.
  • The classification of postoperative RLI was as follows: grade 0 (none), 1 (marginal), 2 (partial), 3 (segmental), or 4 (necrotic) as previously defined.
  • Imaging assessments were retrospectively performed by the experienced members of the surgical team.
  • Team members were masked to the postoperative outcomes.
  • Furthermore, stratification of survival after resection was done by RLI grade.
  • In addition, predictors of RLI grade 2 or higher and survival were identified.

Results

  • Findings demonstrated that among 202 patients (median [range] age, 56 [27-87] years; 84 female), the RLI grades were as follows: grade 0 (105 patients), grade 1 (47 patients), grade 2 (45 patients), grade 3 (5 patients), and grade 4 (0 patients).
  • Data reported worse recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates after hepatic resection in patients with RLI grade 2 or higher vs grade 1 or lower (RFS at 3 years, 6.4% [3 of 50] vs 39.2% [60 of 152]; P < .001 and CSS at 5 years, 20.7% [10 of 50] vs 63.7% [97 of 152]; P < .001).
  • Researchers observed that largest metastasis at least 3 cm (OR, 2.74; 95% CI, 1.35-5.70; P = .005), multiple CLMs (OR, 2.51; 95% CI, 1.25-5.24; P = .009), and nonanatomic resection (odds ratio [OR], 3.29; 95% CI, 1.52-7.63; P = .002) were related to RLI grade 2 or higher.
  • In addition, they noted that a largest metastasis at least 3 cm (hazard ratio [HR], 1.70; 95% CI, 1.01-2.88; P = .045), mutant RAS (HR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.27-3.64; P = .005), and RLI grade 2 or higher (HR, 2.90; 95% CI, 1.69-4.84; P < .001) were related to worse CSS.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay