Reliability of gastric suctioning compared with ultrasound assessment of residual gastric volume: A prospective multicentre cohort study
Anaesthesia Dec 12, 2019
Bouvet L, Zieleskiewicz L, Loubradou E, et al. - For the evaluation of residual gastric volume, the reliability of aspiration via a nasogastric tube was compared with ultrasound in this study performed on 61 adult patients on mechanical ventilation, receiving continuous enteral feeding via a nasogastric tube for > 48 h. A total of 60 (98%) patients had a qualitatively evaluated full stomach at first ultrasound test as compared with 52 (85%) following gastric suctioning. Researchers found a significant reduction in the calculated gastric volume after gastric suctioning, with no significant reduction noted in the number of patients with volume ≥ 250 ml. Within the last 24 h, vomiting occurred in four of the nine patients with calculated gastric volume ≥ 250 ml. They noted a significant reduction in the antral cross-sectional area between the third and the fourth ultrasound examination. Findings revealed the non-reliability of gastric suctioning as a tool to monitor residual gastric volume, as well as the feasibility and promising utility of gastric ultrasound as a tool for gastric volume monitoring in clinical practice.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries