Randomised phase 2 study of pembrolizumab plus CC-486 vs pembrolizumab plus placebo in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer
European Journal of Cancer Feb 10, 2019
Levy BP, et al. - In this phase 2 trial including patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with one prior line of platinum-containing therapy, researchers assessed the efficacy of second-line pembrolizumab + CC-486 (oral azacitidine). The participants received CC-486 or placebo, using randomization in a ratio of 1:1, on days 1–14, in combination with pembrolizumab on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The study population comprised 100 patients randomised (pembrolizumab + CC-486: 51; pembrolizumab + placebo: 49). Most of these were male (57.0%), were white (87.0%) and had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1 (68.0%). The pembrolizumab + CC-486 and pembrolizumab + placebo arms were not significantly different in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) (median, 2.9 and 4.0 months, respectively). A shorter median treatment duration (15.0 vs 24.1 weeks), and lower number of cycles (5.0 vs 7.0) was reported with pembrolizumab + CC-486 vs pembrolizumab + placebo. Overall, pembrolizumab + CC-486 vs pembrolizumab + placebo offered no improvement in PFS. In the pembrolizumab + CC-486 arm, treatment-emergent adverse events were more commonly reported, specifically gastrointestinal, potentially impacting treatment feasibility. Efficacy with pembrolizumab + CC-486 could have been influenced by decreased treatment exposure due to adverse events.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries