Postoperative radiotherapy for invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: An analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database
Cancer Management and Research Oct 12, 2017
Wu SG, et al. - In this study, researchers determined the clinical value of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) of the breast. As per observations, IMPC seemed to have favorable breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and OS. PORT groups were not inferior to non-PORT groups on BCSS and OS. This was regardless of the types of surgical procedures (mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery).
Methods
- Clinicopathological factors extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004Â2013) were assessed.
- Researchers performed univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions to assess the independent prognostic factors on breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS).
Results
- This study included 881 patients.
- 444 (50.4%) and 437 (49.6%) underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy (MAST), respectively, of whom 357 (80.4%) and 153 (35.0%) underwent PORT, respectively.
- Patients with young age, large tumor size, or advanced nodal stage more frequently underwent MAST and PORT compared with MAST alone.
- Patients with progesterone receptor-positive disease more frequently received BCS and PORT compared with BCS alone.
- In this study, the 5-year BCSS and OS were 95.7% and 90.9%, respectively.
- Multivariate analyses suggested that tumor size, histological grade, and estrogen receptor status were independent predictors of BCSS and OS.
- The type of surgical procedures (MAST vs. BCS) seemed not an independent predictor of survival outcomes.
- As per multivariate analyses, patients who underwent MAST with or without PORT were similar in terms of BCSS and OS.
- In comparison to those who underwent BCS alone, patients undergoing BCS plus PORT indicated no better outcome regarding BCSS and OS.
- In the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, PORT seemed not related with better BCSS and OS than non-PORT groups in patients who received BCS or MAST.
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries