• Profile
Close

Postoperative radiotherapy for invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: An analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database

Cancer Management and Research Oct 12, 2017

Wu SG, et al. - In this study, researchers determined the clinical value of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) of the breast. As per observations, IMPC seemed to have favorable breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and OS. PORT groups were not inferior to non-PORT groups on BCSS and OS. This was regardless of the types of surgical procedures (mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery).

Methods

  • Clinicopathological factors extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004–2013) were assessed.
  • Researchers performed univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions to assess the independent prognostic factors on breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

  • This study included 881 patients.
  • 444 (50.4%) and 437 (49.6%) underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy (MAST), respectively, of whom 357 (80.4%) and 153 (35.0%) underwent PORT, respectively.
  • Patients with young age, large tumor size, or advanced nodal stage more frequently underwent MAST and PORT compared with MAST alone.
  • Patients with progesterone receptor-positive disease more frequently received BCS and PORT compared with BCS alone.
  • In this study, the 5-year BCSS and OS were 95.7% and 90.9%, respectively.
  • Multivariate analyses suggested that tumor size, histological grade, and estrogen receptor status were independent predictors of BCSS and OS.
  • The type of surgical procedures (MAST vs. BCS) seemed not an independent predictor of survival outcomes.
  • As per multivariate analyses, patients who underwent MAST with or without PORT were similar in terms of BCSS and OS.
  • In comparison to those who underwent BCS alone, patients undergoing BCS plus PORT indicated no better outcome regarding BCSS and OS.
  • In the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, PORT seemed not related with better BCSS and OS than non-PORT groups in patients who received BCS or MAST.

Full text available Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay