• Profile
Close

Phase III, randomized study of dual human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade with lapatinib plus trastuzumab in combination with an aromatase inhibitor in postmenopausal women with HER2-positive, hormone receptor–positive metastatic breast cancer: ALTERNATIVE

Journal of Clinical Oncology Dec 22, 2017

Johnston SRD, et al. - Researchers performed the ALTERNATIVE study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dual HER2 blockade plus aromatase inhibitor (AI) in postmenopausal women with HER2-positive/HR-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who received prior endocrine therapy (ET) and prior neo(adjuvant)/first-line trastuzumab (TRAS) plus chemotherapy. Dual HER2 blockade with LAP + TRAS + AI vs TRAS + AI demonstrated a higher progression-free survival benefit in patients with HER2-positive/HR-positive MBC. For this patient population, this combination proved an effective and safe chemotherapy-sparing alternative treatment regimen.

Methods

  • Researchers randomized patients (1:1:1) to receive lapatinib (LAP) + TRAS + AI, TRAS + AI, or LAP + AI.
  • They excluded patients for whom chemotherapy was intended.
  • Progression-free survival (PFS; investigator assessed) with LAP + TRAS + AI vs TRAS + AI was observed as the primary end point.
  • PFS (comparison of other arms), overall survival, overall response rate, clinical benefit rate, and safety were the secondary end points.

Results

  • This analysis included 355 patients: LAP + TRAS + AI (n = 120), TRAS + AI (n = 117), and LAP + AI (n = 118).
  • Baseline characteristics were balanced.
  • The study met its primary end point; LAP + TRAS + AI vs TRAS + AI indicated superior PFS (median PFS, 11 v 5.7 months; hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.88; P=.0064).
  • Predefined subgroups indicated consistent PFS benefit.
  • LAP + TRAS + AI was also superior in terms of overall response rate, clinical benefit rate, and overall survival.
  • The median PFS with LAP + AI vs TRAS + AI was 8.3 vs 5.7 months (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.98; P=.0361).
  • With LAP + TRAS + AI, TRAS + AI, and LAP + AI, common adverse events (AEs; ≥ 15%) were diarrhea (69%, 9%, and 51%, respectively), rash (36%, 2%, and 28%, respectively), nausea (22%, 9%, and 22%, respectively), and paronychia (30%, 0%, and 15%, respectively), mostly grade 1 or 2.
  • Across the three groups, serious AEs were reported similarly.
  • AEs leading to discontinuation were lower with LAP + TRAS + AI.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay