• Profile
Close

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy vs extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal insufficiency

World Journal of Urology Jun 05, 2021

AbdelRazek M, Abolyosr A, AbdelKader MS, et al. - This prospective randomized clinical study was undertaken to determine the impact and result of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) vs extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in patients experiencing renal insufficiency. This analysis involved 104 renal insufficiency patients having renal stones (serum creatinine 2–4 mg/dl and eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m 2 more than 3 months) who were randomized into two groups: Group A had PNL; Group B received SWL. The stone-free rate was identified to be 84% in Group A vs 26.6% in Group B following the first SWL session. Significant improvement of serum creatinine levels by 9.1%, significant improvement of creatinine clearance and eGFR, all were observed on comparing pre and postoperative outcomes of Group A. Although concerning Group B preoperatively and 3 months post-SWL, a significant improvement by 8.7% was evident which was less than that of Group A, eGFR also improved by 6.7% which was less than the eGFR improvement in Group A (12.3%). Findings showed that encouraging results were conferred by PNL and SWL as minimally invasive procedures for renal insufficiency and renal stones cases, with no negative impacts on renal function.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay