• Profile
Close

Pacritinib vs best available therapy, including ruxolitinib, in patients with myelofibrosis: A randomized clinical trial

JAMA Oncology Mar 13, 2018

Mascarenhas J, et al. - Pacritinib, a Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor, was compared with the best available therapy (BAT), including ruxolitinib, in patients with myelofibrosis and thrombocytopenia. In this patient population including those with prior anti-JAK therapy, pacritinib vs BAT, including ruxolitinib, was shown to be more effective in reducing splenomegaly and symptoms when given twice daily.

Methods
  • A total of 311 patients with myelofibrosis and platelet count 100 × 109/L or less were analyzed in this phase 3 randomized international multicenter study—the PERSIST-2 study—of pacritinib vs BAT.
  • Crossover from BAT was allowed after week 24 or for progression of splenomegaly.
  • Random assignment (1:1:1) of patients to receive pacritinib 400 mg once daily, pacritinib 200 mg twice daily, or BAT, was done.
  • Rates of patients achieving 35% or more spleen volume reduction (SVR) and 50% or more reduction in total symptom score (TSS) at week 24 were the coprimary end points.
  • Researchers carried out efficacy analyses in the intention-to-treat efficacy population, comprising all patients with a randomization date allowing for week 24 data.

Results
  • This study included a total of 311 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.70 [9.08] years; 171 men [55%] and 140 women [45%]); 149 patients (48%) had prior ruxolitinib.
  • Ruxolitinib was noted to be the most common BAT (44 patients [45%]); 19 patients (19%) received watchful-waiting only.
  • A total of 75 patients were included in intention-to-treat efficacy population; these patients were randomized to pacritinib once daily; 74, pacritinib twice daily, and 72, BAT.
  • Findings demonstrated the greater efficacy of pacritinib (arms combined) than BAT for 35% or more SVR (27 patients [18%] vs 2 patients [3%]; P=.001).
  • Moreover, pacritinib had a nonsignificantly greater rate of 50% or more reduction in TSS (37 patients [25%] vs 10 patients [14%]; P=.08).
  • Researchers noted that pacritinib twice daily led to significant improvements in both end points over BAT (≥35% SVR: 16 patients [22%] vs 2 patients [3%]; P=.001; ≥50% reduction in TSS: 24 patients [32%] vs 10 patients [14%]; P=.01).
  • Furthermore, pacritinib twice daily resulted in greatest clinical improvement in hemoglobin as well as reduction in transfusion burden.
  • Data showed that the most common (>10%) grade 3 or 4 adverse events for pacritinib once daily, pacritinib twice daily, and BAT, included thrombocytopenia (32 patients [31%], 34 patients [32%], 18 patients [18%]), and anemia (28 patients [27%], 23 patients [22%], 14 patients [14%]).
  • Additionally, it was noted that in the pacritinib once daily, twice daily, and BAT arms, discontinuation owing to adverse events occurred in 15 patients (14%), 10 patients (9%), and 4 patients (4%).
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay