Oral ixazomib maintenance following autologous stem cell transplantation (TOURMALINE-MM3): A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial
The Lancet Dec 14, 2018
Dimopoulos MA, et al. - Experts ascertained the safety and efficacy of ixazomib as maintenance therapy following autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Progression-free survival (PFS) was prolonged by ixazomib maintenance and it represents an additional option for post-transplant maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Methods- Authors conducted a phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled TOURMALINE-MM3 study in 167 clinical or hospital sites in 30 countries in Europe, the Middle East, Africa, Asia, and North and South America.
- Adults with a confirmed diagnosis of symptomatic multiple myeloma according to International Myeloma Working Group criteria who had achieved at least a partial response after undergoing standard-of-care induction therapy followed by high-dose melphalan (200 mg/m 2) conditioning and single ASCT within 12 months of diagnosis were the eligible participants.
- They randomly assigned the patients in a 3:2 ratio to oral ixazomib or matching placebo on days 1, 8, and 15 in 28-day cycles for 2 years following induction, high-dose therapy, and transplantation.
- They increased the initial 3 mg dose to 4 mg from cycle 5 if tolerated during cycles 1–4.
- They stratified the randomisation by induction regimen, pre-induction disease stage, and response post-transplantation.
- Progression-free survival (PFS) by intention-to-treat analysis was the primary endpoint.
- They evaluated safety in all patients who received at least one dose of ixazomib or placebo, according to treatment actually received.
- They enrolled 656 patients between July 31, 2014, and March 14, 2016 and randomly assigned to receive ixazomib maintenance therapy (n=395) or placebo (n=261).
- As per data, with a median follow-up of 31 months (IQR 27.3–35.7), they observed a 28% reduction in the risk of progression or death with ixazomib vs placebo (median PFS 26.5 months [95% CI 23.7–33.8] vs 21.3 months [18.0–24.7]; hazard ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.58–0.89; p=0.0023).
- At the time of this analysis, no increase in second malignancies was noted with ixazomib therapy (12 [3%] patients) vs placebo (eight [3%] patients).
- Results demonstrated that 108 (27%) of 394 patients in the ixazomib group and 51 (20%) of 259 patients in the placebo group experienced serious adverse events.
- In the ixazomib group one patient died during the treatment period, and none died in the placebo group.
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries