Multicenter prevalence of anaphylaxis in clinic-based oral food challenges
Annals of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Sep 11, 2017
Akuete K, et al. Â Researchers inspected the epidemiology, symptoms, and treatment of clinical low-risk oral food challenges (OFCs) in the nonresearch setting. Data demonstrated that performing clinical nonresearch open low-risk OFCs resulted in few allergic reactions, as the largest national survey of allergic reactions of clinical open OFCs in a nonresearch setting in the United States. Moreover, 86% of challenges resulted in no reactions and 98% without anaphylaxis.
Methods
- They acquired data from 2008 to 2013 through a physician survey in 5 food allergy centers geographically distributed across the United States.
- A linear mixed model was used to identify allergic reaction rates and the association of reaction rates with year, hospital, and demographics.
- By using a random-effects model with exact confidence intervals (Cis), meta-analysis was used to pool the proportion of reactions and anaphylaxis with inverse-variance weights.
Results
- As per findings, 6,377 OFCs were performed.
- In addition, the pooled estimate of anaphylaxis was 2% (95% CI, 1%-3%).
- Demonstrating consistency during the study period (P = .40), the rate of allergic reactions was 14% (95% CI, 13%-16%).
- 13% to 33% was the range of reaction rates.
- As compared to females (95% CI, 4%-37.5%; P = .04), males reacted 16% more frequently.
- In 2013, foods challenged varied geographically.
- Moreover, peanut was the most challenged food in the Northeast, Midwest, and West and egg was the most challenged in the South.
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries