Most systematic reviews of high methodological quality on psoriasis interventions are classified as high risk of bias using ROBIS tool
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology Sep 15, 2017
Gomez-Garcia F, et al. - A comparative scrutiny was performed of the capacity of both instruments to capture the quality of systematic reviews (SRs) concerning psoriasis interventions. The methodological quality was found to be suboptimal along with elevated risk of bias, even for SRs exhibiting high methodological quality while taking into account the SRs published about psoriasis. AMSTAR and ROBIS tools could be regarded as complementary when conducting a quality assessment of SRs.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries