• Profile
Close

Maternal and neonatal outcomes after bariatric surgery; a systematic review and meta-analysis: Do the benefits outweigh the risks?

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Evidence based | Feb 21, 2018

Kwong W, et al. - Researchers here aimed at assessing the benefits and risks of bariatric surgery in obese women on obstetrical outcomes. Findings suggest that bariatric surgery is associated with a reduction in the risk of several adverse obstetrical outcomes. However, when discussing bariatric surgery with reproductive-age women, they recommend considering a potential for an increased risk of other important outcomes.

Methods

  • Researchers performed a systematic literature search using MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science and PubMed from inception up to December 12, 2016.
  • They included studies evaluating patients who underwent bariatric surgery, reporting subsequent pregnancy outcomes, and comparing these outcomes to a control group.
  • Two reviewers independently extracted study outcomes.
  • Using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, risk of bias was assessed.
  • Using the Dersimonian and Laird random effects model, pooled odds ratios (OR) for each outcome were estimated.

Results

  • Researchers reviewed 2616 abstracts, and included 20 cohort studies and approximately 2.8 million subjects (8,364 of which had bariatric surgery) in the meta-analysis.
  • Subjects undergoing bariatric surgery demonstrated lower rates of gestational diabetes (OR 0.20, CI 0.11 - 0.37, Number needed to benefit (NNTB) 5), large for gestational age infants (OR 0.31, CI 0.17 - 0.59, NNTB 6), gestational hypertension (OR 0.38, CI 0.19 - 0.76, NNTB 11), all hypertensive disorders (OR 0.38, CI 0.27 - 0.53, NNTB 8), postpartum hemorrhage (OR 0.32, CI 0.08 - 1.37, NNTB 21) and C-section rates (OR 0.50, CI 0.38 - 0.67, NNTB 9), but an increase in small for gestational age infants (OR 2.16, CI 1.34 - 3.48, Number needed to harm (NNTH) 21), intrauterine growth restriction (OR 2.16, CI 1.34 - 3.48, NNTH 66), and pre-term deliveries (OR 1.35, CI 1.02 - 1.79, NNTH 35) in comparison to controls matched for pre-surgery body mass index (BMI).
  • No differences were identified in rates of preeclampsia, NICU admissions, stillbirths, malformations and neonatal death.
  • A greater increase in small for gestational age infants (p=0.0466), and a greater decrease in large for gestational age infants (p=0<0.0001) were observed with malabsorptive surgeries compared with restrictive surgeries.
  • Use of administrative databases, relative to clinical charts, revealed no differences in outcomes.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay