Long-term outcomes with intensive induction chemotherapy (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin/bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) and standard bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin in poor prognosis germ cell tumours: A randomised phase II trial (ISRCTN53643604)
European Journal of Cancer Feb 24, 2020
Cafferty FH, et al. - Given standard BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin) chemotherapy results in death in up to 50% of men with poor prognosis, non-seminoma germ cell tumours (GCTs), and response targets were met by an intensive regimen, CBOP/BEP (carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin/BEP), in a randomised, phase II trial (74% complete response or partial response marker negative, 90% confidence interval (CI) 61%–85%), so, researchers evaluated long-term results as well as late toxicity related to CBOP/BEP. Overall 89 patients with poor prognosis extracranial GCT were randomly assigned to 4xBEP or CBOP/BEP (2xCBOP, 2xBO, 3xBEP with 15,000iu of bleomycin). For CBOP/BEP and for BEP, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated to be 55.7% and 38.7%, respectively. The estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) was 65.0% and 58.5%, respectively. Stabilizing chemotherapy was found to be related to poorer PFS, whereas unfavourable marker drop, in 60 (70%) patients, was not. The observed outcomes for CBOP/BEP were promising, although not powered for PFS. The influence on OS was less clear (and will be affected by subsequent therapy).
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries