• Profile
Close

Intravenous iron in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis

New England Journal of Medicine Nov 01, 2018

Macdougall IC, et al. - In a multicenter, open-label trial with blinded end-point evaluation, researchers assessed first the noninferiority, and then the safety and effectiveness, of a high-dose regimen of intravenous iron administered proactively, as compared with a low-dose regimen of intravenous iron administered reactively, in patients undergoing hemodialysis. Findings demonstrated that the use of a high-dose regimen of intravenous iron administered proactively brought about a significantly lower dose of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent and a lower incidence of blood transfusion than the use of a low-dose regimen administered reactively.

Methods
  • For this investigation, researchers randomly assigned adults undergoing maintenance hemodialysis to receive either high-dose iron sucrose, administered intravenously in a proactive fashion (400 mg monthly, unless the ferritin concentration was >700 μg per liter or the transferrin saturation was ≥40%), or low-dose iron sucrose, administered intravenously in a reactive fashion (0 to 400 mg monthly, with a ferritin concentration of <200 μg per liter or a transferrin saturation of <20% being a trigger for iron administration).
  • The composite of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or death was the primary end point, evaluated in a time-to-first-event analysis.
  • They also analyzed these end points as recurrent events.
  • Death, infection rate, and dose of an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent were included other secondary end points.
  • If the upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio for the primary end point did not cross 1.25, noninferiority of the high-dose group to the low-dose group would be established.

Results
  • According to the findings obtained, 2141 patients had randomization (1093 patients to the high-dose group and 1048 to the low-dose group).
  • The median follow-up was 2.1 years in this analysis.
  • As compared with 145 mg (interquartile range, 100 to 190) in the low-dose group, patients in the high-dose group received a median monthly iron dose of 264 mg (interquartile range [25th to 75th percentile], 200 to 336).
  • It was noted that the median monthly dose of an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent was 29,757 IU in the high-dose group and 38,805 IU in the low-dose group (median difference, −7539 IU; 95% confidence interval [CI], −9485 to −5582).
  • As compared with 343 (32.7%) in the low-dose group (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.03; P < 0.001 for noninferiority), 333 patients (30.5%) in the high-dose group had a primary end-point event.
  • Four hundred fifty-six events in the high-dose group and 538 in the low-dose group (rate ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.92) were observed in an analysis that used a recurrent-events approach.
  • In the two groups, the infection rate was the same.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay