• Profile
Close

Intravenous epoetin alfa-epbx vs epoetin alfa for treatment of anemia in end-stage kidney disease

Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology Jun 29, 2018

Fishbane S, et al. - In this 24-week, comparative, clinical trial, researchers compared intravenous epoetin alfa-epbx, an epoetin alfa biosimilar, to epoetin alfa with respect to the safety and efficacy in patients on hemodialysis with ESKD and anemia. They found that the efficacy and safety displayed by epoetin alfa-epbx vs epoetin alfa were not different to an extent that can be considered as clinically meaningful.

Methods

  • Researchers performed a 24-week, multicenter, double-blind comparative efficacy and safety study.
  • Study participants were 612 patients on hemodialysis with ESKD and anemia who had stable hemoglobin and were receiving stable doses of intravenous epoetin alfa.
  • Participants were randomized (1:1) to intravenous epoetin alfa or epoetin alfa-epbx.
  • According to the epoetin alfa prescribing information, they adjusted dosing.
  • The least squares mean difference between the two treatments in mean weekly hemoglobin level and mean weekly epoetin dose per kilogram of body weight during the last 4 weeks of treatment were coprimary efficacy end points.

Results

  • Between epoetin alfa-epbx and epoetin alfa, the reported least squares mean difference in weekly hemoglobin was -0.12 g/dl and the 95% confidence interval (-0.25 to 0.01) was contained within the prespecified equivalence margin (-0.5 to 0.5 g/dl).
  • They found that 0.37 U/kg per week was the least squares mean difference between epoetin alfa-epbx and epoetin alfa in weekly epoetin dose per kilogram of body weight, and the 95% confidence interval (-10.40 to 11.13) was contained within the prespecified equivalence margin (-45 to 45 U/kg per week).
  • Similar findings were reported between the epoetin alfa-epbx vs epoetin alfa groups with regards to the incidences of adverse events (77.1% vs 75.3%), serious adverse events (24.9% vs 27.0%), and deaths (n=5 vs 6).
  • Data revealed that at baseline, five patients tested positive for anti-recombinant human erythropoietin antibodies.
  • Wile on study treatment, the development of anti-recombinant human erythropoietin antibodies was reported in two additional patients (n=1 per group).
  • They found that all patients tested negative for neutralizing antibodies.
  • An event of pure red cell aplasia was not experienced by patients in either group.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay