• Profile
Close

Incidence of infection in non‐tunnelled thoracic epidural catheters after major abdominal surgery

Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Jun 16, 2020

Vogelsang H, Lang A, Cevik B, et al. - Although rare, side‐effects and complications following thoracic epidural analgesia are potentially devastating. Nearly 5.5% incidence of catheter‐related infection has been reported. For reducing the incidence of infections and dislocations, tunnelling is often recommended. Researchers here conducted a retrospective, monocentric analysis of their acute pain service database in order to determine the incidence of catheter‐related infections (primary endpoint) and effect of the used disinfectant (secondary endpoint). The standard operating protocol incorporated the hygiene measures of the German Society of Anaesthesiology since 2009. Elective major abdominal surgery with thoracic epidural catheterization was performed in a total of 2,755 patients. Among these cases, a low incidence of catheter‐related infections was noted and with only mild signs of infection. Non‐tunnelling could be an alternative to tunnelling, particularly when following hygiene protocols, and the duration of catheter use is short. They emphasize the necessity for a comprehensive database and regular examinations by trained staff for early identification of abnormalities and immediate removal of the catheter, if required.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay