Evaluation of prolonged vs short courses of antibiotic prophylaxis following ear, nose, throat, and oral and maxillofacial surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
JAMA Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Jul 24, 2019
Oppelaar MC, et al. - Researchers conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare short-course antibiotic prophylaxis (≤24 hours) compared to extended-course antibiotic prophylaxis (≥72 hours) after ear, nose, throat, and oral and maxillofacial surgery. There were 21 articles with a cumulative 1974 patient included in the meta-analysis. No distinction was discovered in postoperative infections after ear, nose, throat, and oral and maxillofacial surgery between short-course and extended-course antibiotic prophylaxis. Therefore, it is advised to take a brief course of antibiotic prophylaxis unless there are documented conditions that are best treated with an extended course. The use of short-course antibiotics could prevent further adverse events, development of antibiotic resistance, and greater hospital expenses. Future study should concentrate on identifying risk groups for which prolonged prophylaxis could benefit.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries