Effect of low-normal vs high-normal oxygenation targets on organ dysfunction in critically ill patients
JAMA Sep 05, 2021
Gelissen H, de Grooth HJ, Smulders Y, et al. - No statistically significant reduction in organ dysfunction was conferred by treatment with a low-normal PaO 2 target, vs a high-normal PaO 2 target, in critically ill patients with 2 or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria.
This was a randomized clinical trial of 400 patients in the intensive care unit with at least 2 positive SIRS criteria.
Randomization to a target PaO 2 range of 8 to 12 kPa vs 14 to 18 kPa caused a median SOFA RANK score [a ranked outcome of nonrespiratory organ failure quantified by the nonrespiratory components of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score] of −35 vs −40 (lower score implies less organ failure severity), a difference that was not statistically significant.
More frequent occurrence of mild hypoxemic measurements was noted in the low-normal group (1.9% vs 1.2%; median difference, 0.73).
Median duration of mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality did not differ significantly between groups.
In the low-normal PaO 2 group and high-normal PaO 2 group, acute kidney failure occurred in 20 patients (10%) and in 21 patients (11%) and acute myocardial infarction in 6 patients (2.9%) and in 7 patients (3.6%), respectively.
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries