Effect of low-normal vs high-normal oxygenation targets on organ dysfunction in critically ill patients
JAMA Sep 19, 2021
Gelissen H, de Grooth HJ, Smulders Y, et al. - No statistically significant reduction in organ dysfunction was conferred by treatment with a low-normal PaO2 target vs a high-normal PaO2 target in critically ill patients with 2 or more systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria.
Increase in organ dysfunction in critically ill patients may result from hyperoxemia.
This randomized clinical trial included 400 patients in the ICU with at least 2 positive SIRS criteria.
SOFA RANK , a ranked outcome of nonrespiratory organ failure quantified by the nonrespiratory components of SOFA score, summed over the first 14 study days, was the primary endpoint.
Randomization of patients to a target PaO2 range of 8 to 12 kPa vs 14 to 18 kPa led to a median SOFA RANK score of −35 vs −40 (lower score implies less organ failure severity), a difference that was not statistically significant.
In terms of median duration of mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality, no significant difference was observed between groups.
In the low-normal and high-normal PaO2 groups, occurrence of acute kidney failure was seen in 20 patients (10%) and 21 patients (11%), respectively, and that of acute myocardial infarction in 6 patients (2.9%) and 7 patients (3.6%), respectively.
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries