Differences between palpable and nonpalpable tumors in early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer
The American Journal of Surgery Feb 22, 2018
Warren SL, et al. - The purpose of this study was to draw a comparison between the characteristics and outcomes of palpable and nonpalpable, hormone-sensitive, early-stage breast cancers. The experts noted that palpable tumors were likely to have more aggressive features and metastatic potential, in a group of hormone-sensitive, mostly postmenopausal early-stage breast cancer cases, which presented as an increased incidence of breast cancer-related events and worse overall survival.
Methods
- Authours divided patients from the North American Fareston vs Tamoxifen Adjuvant (NAFTA) trial into palpable (n=513) and nonpalpable (n=1063) tumor groups.
- They evaluated the differences in pathological features, loco-regional therapy, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results
- The cases with palpable tumors were noted to be older, had larger tumors, and higher rates of lymph-node involvement.
- Findings revealed that the tumors were more likely to be poorly differentiated, of high nuclear grade, and displayed lymphovascular invasion.
- DFS and OS were notably lower for palpable as compared to the nonpalpable tumors after mean follow-up of 59 months (DFS 93.5% vs 98.4%, p < 0.001, OS 88.5% vs 95.6%, p < 0.001).
- After controlling for age, size and nodal status, palpability was found to be an independent factor for DFS (OR=2.56; 95%CI, 1.37-4.79, p=0.003) and OS (OR=2.12; 95%CI, 1.38-3.28, p < 0.001).
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries