Coronary CT angiography and 5-year risk of myocardial infarction
New England Journal of Medicine Aug 31, 2018
Newby DE, et al. - Researchers investigated the impact of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) on 5-year clinical outcomes in patients with stable chest pain. They found that CTA + standard care vs standard care alone resulted in a significantly lower rate of death from coronary heart disease or nonfatal myocardial infarction at 5 years in patients with stable chest pain, with no significantly higher rate of coronary angiography or coronary revascularization.
Methods
- This is an open-label, multicenter, parallel-group trial.
- Researchers randomized 4,146 patients with stable chest pain who had been referred to a cardiology clinic for evaluation to standard care plus CTA (2,073 patients) or to standard care alone (2,073 patients).
- Three to 7 years of follow-up was done to evaluate investigations, treatments, and clinical outcomes.
- Death from coronary heart disease or nonfatal myocardial infarction at 5 years was assessed as primary end point.
Results
- Ultimately, 20,254 patient-years of follow-up was generated by 4.8 years of median follow-up.
- They reported a lower 5-year rate of the primary end point in the CTA group vs in the standard-care group (2.3% [48 patients] vs 3.9% [81 patients]; hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 0.84; P=0.004).
- First few months of follow-up revealed higher rates of invasive coronary angiography and coronary revascularization in the CTA group vs the standard-care group, but at 5 years these overall rates were comparable: 491 patients in the CTA group and 502 patients in the standard-care group had invasive coronary angiography (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.13), and coronary revascularization was performed in 279 patients in the CTA group and in 267 in the standard-care group (hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.27).
- However, findings showed the initiation of more preventive therapies in patients in the CTA group (odds ratio, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.65), as well as more antianginal therapies (odds ratio, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.54).
- No significant between-group differences in the rates of cardiovascular or noncardiovascular deaths or deaths from any cause were identified.
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries