Continued vs interrupted oral anticoagulation during transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation and impact of postoperative anticoagulant management on outcome in patients with atrial fibrillation
The American Journal of Cardiology Jan 11, 2019
Mangner N, et al. - In this retrospective analysis of 598 consecutive patients, researchers assessed the influence of continued vs interrupted oral anticoagulation (OAC) on early safety, as well as the impact of postoperative anticoagulant management on 1-year mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) for severe aortic stenosis (AS). Participants were categorized as interrupted (iVKA) vs continued vitamin K antagonist (cVKA) vs continued direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) at the time of TF-TAVI. Baseline characteristics were equivalent among patients with iVKA (n=299), cVKA (n=117) and DOAC (n=182). No difference was found in the proportion of patients having a CHA2DS2-VASc-Score ≥3 and HAS-BLED-Score ≥3 between the groups. According to findings, the rate for the composite end point of early safety at 30 days was not increased with cVKA use. A significantly reduced rate of early safety endpoints at 30 days was observed in relation to use of a DOAC. In multivariate analysis, DOAC was found to be related to attenuated all-cause 1-year mortality while cVKA was comparable to iVKA.
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries