Comparison of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy and conventional reserve-bag oxygen therapy in carbon monoxide intoxication: A pilot study
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine Nov 17, 2019
Kim YM, et al. - High-flow nasal cannula oxygen (HFNC) creates a positive pressure effect through high-flow rates compared with conventional oxygen therapy. Researchers investigated the effects of HFNC vs conventional oxygen therapy on the rate of carbon monoxide (CO) clearance from the blood in patients with mild to moderate CO poisoning. In this human pilot study, CO-poisoned patients randomly assigned to receive 100% oxygen from a rebreathing reserve mask (NBO 2, flow of 15 L/min) or HFNC (flow of 60 L/min). They identified a total of 22 patients who had fraction of COHb value (fCOHb) levels ≥ 10% at the time of ED arrival; 9 of these had fCOHb level ranging between 25% and 50%. No reduction in half-life time of fCOHb (fCOHb t 1/2) was observed with HFNC therapy vs NBO 2 therapy. However, HFNC therapy seemed to be beneficial in maintaining a constant fCOHbt 1/2 as well as in reducing fCOHbt 1/2 in mild CO poisoning patients compared with conventional NBO 2 therapy.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries