Comparison of clinical outcome of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma according to macrovascular invasion and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization refractory status
Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology May 27, 2018
Kodama K, et al. - In view of the observation that for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with distant metastasis, unresectable HCC, and HCC refractory to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or with macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI), sorafenib is the standard treatment and in Southeast and East Asian countries, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has been used for advanced HCC, researchers sought for clearer information for choosing appropriately between these therapies. They noted transcatheter arterial chemoembolization refractory status with HAIC and MVI with sorafenib to be associated with poor prognosis. In MVI and non-TACE refractory cases, HAIC was particularly significantly better than sorafenib as primary treatment. Thus they recommend considering these factors in treatment selection.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries