• Profile
Close

Comparing survival outcomes and costs associated with radical cystectomy and trimodal therapy for older adults with muscle-invasive bladder cancer

JAMA Surgery Jul 07, 2018

Williams SB, et al. - Survival outcomes and costs related to trimodal therapy vs radical cystectomy were compared in older adults with muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Findings revealed significantly lower overall and cancer-specific survival rates at significantly higher costs in association with trimodal therapy vs radical cystectomy.

Methods

  • Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare linked database, researchers performed this population-based cohort study.
  • For this analysis, they included 3,200 older adults (aged ≥ 66 years) with clinical stage T2 to T4a bladder cancer diagnosed from January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2011, and with claims data available through December 31, 2013.
  • Management of patients who received radical cystectomy included either only surgery or surgery in combination with radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
  • In this work, patients receiving trimodal therapy underwent transurethral resection of the bladder followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy.
  • They used propensity score matching by sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.
  • Using the Cox proportional hazards regression model and the Fine and Gray competing risk model, they evaluated overall survival and cancer-specific survival.
  • Comparison of all Medicare health care costs for inpatient, outpatient, and physician services within 30, 90, and 180 days of treatment was performed.
  • They assessed the total amount spent nationwide using 180-day medical costs between treatments by the total number of new cases of muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the United States in 2011.

Results

  • The inclusion criteria was met by 3,200 patients (2,048 [64%] were men and 1,152 [36%] were women; mean age was 75.8 [6.0] years).
  • Trimodal therapy was given to 687 patients (21.5%) and radical cystectomy was performed on 687 patients (21.5%) after propensity score matching.
  • Researchers noted significantly decreased overall survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.49; 95% CI, 1.31-1.69) and cancer-specific survival (HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.32-1.83) for patients who underwent trimodal therapy.
  • Costs at 30 days were not significantly different between trimodal therapy ($15 233 in 2002 vs $18 743 in 2011) and radical cystectomy ($17,990 in 2002 vs $21,738 in 2011).
  • However, with trimodal therapy vs radical cystectomy, median total costs were significantly higher at 90 days ($80,174 vs $69,181; median difference, $8964; Hodges-Lehmann 95% CI, $3,848-$14,079) and at 180 days ($179,891 vs $107,017; median difference, $63,771; Hodges-Lehmann 95% CI, $55,512-$72,029).
  • Extrapolating these figures to the total US population indicate that for patients who received a muscle-invasive bladder cancer diagnosis in 2011, trimodal therapy resulted in $335 million in excess spending compared with the less costly radical cystectomy ($492 million).
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay