Comparative effectiveness of certolizumab pegol, abatacept, and biosimilar infliximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis treated in routine care: Observational data from the Danish DANBIO Registry emulating a randomized trial
Arthritis & Rheumatology Dec 08, 2019
Grøn KL, Glintborg B, Nørgaard M, et al. - In this observational cohort study following a randomized trial (using intent-to-treat analyses), investigators intended to evaluate compliance with guidelines (supporting the assumption of surrogate randomization) and to contrast the efficiency of certolizumab pegol (CZP), abatacept (ABA), and biosimilar infliximab (CT-P13) in individuals treated according to guidelines. Seven hundred seventy-six people were recruited in the study and randomized to CZP (n = 336), ABA (n = 215), and CT-P13 (n = 225). The surrogate randomization procedure allowed head-to-head comparisons of CZP, ABA, and CT-P13. However, some variations in predicted efficiency were noted across drugs, confidence intervals were extensive and statistical importance was not relinquished.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries