Cemented proximal femoral replacement for the management of non neoplastic conditions: A versatile implant but not without its risks
Journal of Arthroplasty Sep 18, 2019
Christopher F, et al. - Researchers examined the largest series of proximal femoral replacements (PFRs) to date that underwent PFR for non-neoplastic conditions between 2010 and 2018 in order to determine the re-operation, complication and mortality rates following PFR. Over the eight-year study period, 78 patients underwent 79 PFRs. The most common indication for PFR was periprosthetic fracture (63.3%). They observed 30-day mortality rate of 7.6% (six patients); of these, four patients suffered bone cement implantation syndrome. One-year mortality of 12.7% and reports of complication occurrence in 22.8% were identified. In the armamentarium of a revision arthroplasty surgeon, a cemented PFR seems to be a versatile prosthesis that permits immediate full weight-bearing. However, they suggest appropriately considering as a last resort procedure that poses specific risks that must be explained to patients and family.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries