Assessment of optimal patient selection for endovascular thrombectomy beyond 6 hours after symptom onset: A pooled analysis of the AURORA database
JAMA Sep 15, 2021
Albers GW, Lansberg MG, Brown S, et al. - During the 6- to 24-hour treatment interval, endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) was associated with equivalent benefit among patients in the clinical mismatch and target perfusion mismatch subgroups. Such findings suggest the use of EVT as a therapy option for individuals who satisfy the criteria for either of the imaging mismatch profiles within a 6- to 24-hour period.
Among 505 eligible patients, 266 were assigned to the EVT group (mean [SD] age, 68.4 [13.8] years; 146 women [54.9%]) and 239 were assigned to the control group (mean [SD] age, 68.7 [13.7] years; 126 men [52.7%]).
EVT was associated with lower impairment at 90 days compared with no EVT in 295 patients in the clinical mismatch subgroup and 359 patients in the target perfusion mismatch subgroup.
Statistically significant advantages were detected in all 3 terciles for both subgroups, with the highest OR observed for tercile 3.
In total, 132 patients (26.1%) had an undetermined imaging profile and no significant treatment benefit.
There was a significant interaction between treatment effects for the clinical and target perfusion mismatch subgroups vs the undetermined profile subgroup.
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries