• Profile
Close

Antiplatelet therapy vs anticoagulation therapy in cervical artery dissection: The Cervical Artery Dissection in Stroke study (CADISS) randomized clinical trial final results

JAMA Jun 14, 2019

Markus HS, et al. - Via a randomized, prospective, open-label international multicenter parallel clinical trial of 250 patients, researchers assessed the effectiveness of antiplatelets vs anticoagulants for preventing of stroke in cervical dissection and the risk of recurrent stroke. Also, to assess the effect on arterial imaging outcomes. No difference in the presence of residual narrowing or occlusion was seen between those who received antiplatelets vs anticoagulants. There was a low incidence of recurrent strokes during 12 months of follow-up. In terms of outcome events or the rate of recanalization, no difference between treatment groups was seen.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay