Antimicrobial stewardship opportunities in critically ill patients with gram-negative lower respiratory tract infections: A multicenter cross-sectional analysis
Infectious Diseases and Therapy Nov 30, 2017
Claeys KC, et al. - The infection characteristics, antibiotic consumption, and clinical and economic outcomes of patients with Gram-negative (GN) lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) treated in intensive care units (ICUs) were described. Researchers recognized frequent identification of drug-resistant pathogens and inappropriate empiric GN therapy in nearly 50% of cases. Inappropriate therapy resulted in increased lengths of stay and higher associated costs of care.
Methods
- A retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study was performed of adult patients treated in ICUs at two large academic medical centers in metropolitan Detroit, Michigan, from October 2013 to October 2015.
- Patients must have had CDC-defined LRTI caused by a GN pathogen during ICU stay to meet the inclusion criteria.
- Researchers assessed minimum inhibitory concentrations for key antimicrobial agents of available Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates.
Results
- Researchers recognoized 472 patients, primarily from the community (346, 73.3%), treated in medical ICUs (272, 57.6%).
- They observed common occurrence of clinically defined pneumonia (264, 55.9%).
- From index respiratory cultures, 619 GN organisms were identified: P. aeruginosa was common (224, 36.2%), with 21.6% of these isolates being multidrug resistant.
- The most frequent empiric GN therapies were cefepime (213, 45.1%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (174, 36.8%).
- In 44.6% of cases, empiric GN therapy was inappropriate.
- The most common reason for inappropriateness was lack of in vitro susceptibility (80.1%).
- Inappropriate empiric GN therapy resulted in longer overall stay, which translated to a median total cost of care of $79,800 (interquartile range $48,775 to $129,600) vs $68,000 (interquartile range $38,400 to $116,175), p=0.013.
- They observed no differences regarding clinical failure (31.5% vs 30.0%, p=0.912) and in-hospital all-cause mortality (26.4% vs 25.9%, p=0.814).
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries