• Profile
Close

Antimicrobial stewardship opportunities in critically ill patients with gram-negative lower respiratory tract infections: A multicenter cross-sectional analysis

Infectious Diseases and Therapy Nov 30, 2017

Claeys KC, et al. - The infection characteristics, antibiotic consumption, and clinical and economic outcomes of patients with Gram-negative (GN) lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) treated in intensive care units (ICUs) were described. Researchers recognized frequent identification of drug-resistant pathogens and inappropriate empiric GN therapy in nearly 50% of cases. Inappropriate therapy resulted in increased lengths of stay and higher associated costs of care.

Methods

  • A retrospective, observational, cross-sectional study was performed of adult patients treated in ICUs at two large academic medical centers in metropolitan Detroit, Michigan, from October 2013 to October 2015.
  • Patients must have had CDC-defined LRTI caused by a GN pathogen during ICU stay to meet the inclusion criteria.
  • Researchers assessed minimum inhibitory concentrations for key antimicrobial agents of available Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates.

Results

  • Researchers recognoized 472 patients, primarily from the community (346, 73.3%), treated in medical ICUs (272, 57.6%).
  • They observed common occurrence of clinically defined pneumonia (264, 55.9%).
  • From index respiratory cultures, 619 GN organisms were identified: P. aeruginosa was common (224, 36.2%), with 21.6% of these isolates being multidrug resistant.
  • The most frequent empiric GN therapies were cefepime (213, 45.1%) and piperacillin/tazobactam (174, 36.8%).
  • In 44.6% of cases, empiric GN therapy was inappropriate.
  • The most common reason for inappropriateness was lack of in vitro susceptibility (80.1%).
  • Inappropriate empiric GN therapy resulted in longer overall stay, which translated to a median total cost of care of $79,800 (interquartile range $48,775 to $129,600) vs $68,000 (interquartile range $38,400 to $116,175), p=0.013.
  • They observed no differences regarding clinical failure (31.5% vs 30.0%, p=0.912) and in-hospital all-cause mortality (26.4% vs 25.9%, p=0.814).

Full text available Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay