• Profile
Close

Antiarrhythmics in cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Heart, Lung, and Circulation Evidence based | Aug 25, 2017

Chowdhury A, et al. – Researchers performed a comprehensive and thorough analysis of current literature reporting the efficacy of antiarrhythmics in advanced life support. They found that efficacy of any antiarrhythmic agents for improving rates of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival to admission, survival to discharge or neurological outcomes, was not conclusively evident in the current literature and data. Given the side effects of some of these agents, further research into their utility in current cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines was recommended.

Methods

  • Two authors performed a systematic search through multiple bibliographic databases including CINAHL, SCOPUS, PubMed, Web of Science, Medline(Ovid) and the Cochrane Clinical Trials Registry.
  • The studies were included if they compared an antiarrhythmic to either a control group, placebo or another antiarrhythmic in adult cardiac arrests.
  • These studies were independently screened for outcomes in cardiac arrest assessing the effect of antiarrhythmics on return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), survival and neurological outcomes.
  • Data was extracted independently, compared for homogeneity and level of evidence was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing the risk of bias.
  • Researchers used the Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) random effects model and assessed heterogeneity using the I2 statistic.

Results

  • Overall, 30 studies, including 39,914 patients, were identified.
  • Researchers identified 8 antiarrhythmic agents.
  • They noted that amiodarone and lidocaine, the two most commonly used agents, demonstrated no significant impact on any outcome either against placebo or each other.
  • Furthermore, small low quality studies revealed benefits in isolated outcomes with esmolol and bretylium against placebo.
  • Data showed that the only significant benefit of one antiarrhythmic over another was demonstrated with nifekalant over lidocaine for survival to admission (p = 0.003).
  • On sensitivity analysis of a small number of high quality level one RCTs, it was found that both amiodarone and lidocaine had a significant increase in survival to admission, with no effect on survival to discharge.

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay