• Profile
Close

Anterior and posterior approaches for cervical myelopathy: Clinical and radiographic outcomes

Spine Apr 25, 2019

Hitchon PW, et al. - Via this retrospective review of patients treated for cervical stenosis and myelopathy, researchers intended to determine the benefits and disadvantages of the anterior and posterior approaches. A total of 38 participants had received anterior cervical fusion and instrumentation and 51 had undergone posterior cervical laminectomy and instrumentation. The participants were observed over a period of at least 6 months. According to findings, a shorter hospital stay and more successful restoration of cervical lordosis was seen in relation to the anterior approach vs posterior surgery and therefore, the anterior approach was advised when the benefits of one approach over the other were not self-evident.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay