Analgesia, anaesthesia and obstetric outcome in women with inherited bleeding disorders
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology Jun 08, 2019
Boyd SC, et al. - Researchers examined a cohort of women with inherited bleeding disorders (IBD) for anesthetic use and obstetric outcomes. From a maternal medicine database, they identified 97 women with IBD that delivered 130 babies at the CWIUH from Jan 2011 to Dec 2016. Comparing pregnancies where regional anaesthesia was not recommended (49) vs pregnancies where regional anaesthesia was considered safe (81), the women were more likely to see an anaesthetist before labour 46 (94%) vs 46 (61%); to require prophylactic haemostatic support for delivery 30 (61%) vs 1 (1%); to use a remifentanil infusion 15 (31%) vs 0 and to have general anaesthesia for Caesarean Section (CS) 10 (20%) vs 1(1%). Outcomes suggest no influence of contraindication to neuraxial blockade on mode of delivery in laboring women with IBD.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries