• Profile
Close

An advance care planning video decision support tool for nursing home residents with advanced dementia: A cluster randomized clinical trial

JAMA Internal Medicine Jun 15, 2018

Mitchell SL, et al. - Researchers investigated whether an advance care planning (ACP) video vs usual care impacts documented advance directives, level of care preferences, goals-of-care discussions, and burdensome treatments among nursing home residents with advanced dementia. Among residents with advanced dementia, an ACP video did not impact preferences, do-not-hospitalize (DNH) status, or burdensome treatments, but it did increase directives to withhold tube-feeding, which residents in the intervention arm were more likely to choose with when proxies preferred comfort care.

Methods

  • The Educational Video to Improve Nursing Home Care in End-stage Dementia (EVINCE) trial was a cluster randomized clinical trial conducted from February 2013 to July 2017, at 64 Boston-area nursing homes (32 facilities per arm).
  • An aggregate of 402 residents with advanced dementia and their proxies (intervention arm, n = 212; control arm, n = 190) were surveyed quarterly for 12 months.
  • A 12-minute ACP video for proxies with written communication of their preferred level of care (comfort, basic, or intensive) to the primary care team was the main interventions.
  • The percentage of residents with DNH directives by 6 months was the primary outcome.
  • Preference for comfort care, documented directives to withhold tube-feeding and intravenous hydration, documented goals-of-care discussions, and burdensome treatments (hospital transfers, tube-feeding, or parenteral therapy) per 1,000 resident-days were the secondary outcomes.
  • When comfort care was preferred, exploratory analyses analyzed associations between trial arm and documented advance directives.

Results

  • Mean age of the 402 study residents was 86.7 years (range, 67-102 years); 350 were white (87.1%) and 323 were female (80.3%), with DNH directives that by 6 months did not differ between arms (63% in both arms; adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.08; 95% CI, 0.69-1.69).
  • Findings revealed that preferences for comfort care, directives to withhold intravenous hydration and burdensome treatments did not significantly differ between trial arms.
  • Results suggested that residents in intervention vs control facilities were more likely to have directives for no tube-feeding at 6 months (70.10% vs 61.90%; AOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.13-2.82) and all other time periods, and documented goals-of-care discussions at 3 months (16.10% vs 7.90%; AOR, 2.58; 95% CI, 1.20-5.54).
  • Residents in the intervention arm were more likely to have both DNH and no tube-feeding directives (72.20% vs 52.80%; AOR, 2.68; 95% CI, 2.68-5.85) when comfort care was preferred.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay