A randomized controlled trial comparing a medial stabilized total knee prosthesis to a cruciate retaining and posterior stabilized design: A report of the clinical and functional outcomes following total knee replacement
Journal of Arthroplasty Mar 06, 2020
Dowsey MM, et al. - A randomized controlled trial was conducted to correlate the performance of 3 total knee joint replacement (TKJR) designs 6 months after the surgery. Between March 2015 and March 2018, researchers included 90 participants, 83 were randomized: PS (n = 26), CR (n = 28), and MS (n = 29). Self-reported improvement in pain and function 6 months after TKJR, using the Oxford Knee Score were the primary outcome measures. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Veterans RAND 12-item Health Survey, Knee Society Score 2011, Timed Up and Go test, and Six-Minute Walk Test were considered as secondary outcomes. IT was noted that MS prosthesis can be supposed to produce similar clinical and functional outcomes to PS and CR designs 6 months after TKJR, and individuals were more satisfied with their outcome. Individuals with MS prosthesis also reported superior pain, function, and quality-of-life outcomes at 12 months compared with CR.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries