A prospective controlled trial comparing xenograft/autogenous bone and collagen-stabilized xenograft for maxillary sinus augmentation-Complications, patient-reported outcomes and volumetric analysis
Clinical Oral Implants Research Dec 15, 2017
Alayan J, et al. - The researchers designed this prospective controlled trial to compare maxillary sinus augmentation (MSA) using 2 different materials—anorganic bovine bone mineral (ABBM) + autogenous bone (AB) (control group) vs collagen-stabilized ABBM (test group) regarding complications, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and volumetric analysis. Using a lateral wall approach, MSA was found to be safe and it correlated with mild to moderate pain and restrictions to daily activities for 48–72 hr. Patients’ reports of morbidity were greater with autogenous bone harvesting. Collagen-stabilized ABBM provided comparable bone volume to AB + ABBM that was sufficient for placement of implants of adequate size with no requirement for further vertical augmentation. They found a significant positive impact of engaging the surrounding sinus walls on graft volume.
Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries