• Profile
Close

A cost-effectiveness analysis for post-ERCP pancreatitis prophylaxis in the United States

Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology Sep 07, 2021

Thiruvengadam NR, Saumoy M, Schneider Y, et al. - In both average-risk and high-risk patients undergoing ERCP, rectal indomethacin was the cost-effective method for preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). When compared with no-prophylaxis, all strategies were cost-effective in high-risk patients, while all strategies except aggressive hydration with lactated ringers were cost-effective in average-risk patients.

  • At a WTP of $100,000, all strategies were cost-effective in preventing PEP in high-risk patients when compared with no prophylaxis.

  • In a direct comparison, rectal indomethacin was the most cost-effective strategy in high-risk patients ($31,589/QALY).

  • In average-risk patients, indomethacin and sublingual nitrates were more cost-effective than no prophylaxis at a WTP of $100,000/QALY.

  • When the two strategies were directly compared, rectal indomethacin was the most cost-effective ($53,016/QALY).

Go to Original
Only Doctors with an M3 India account can read this article. Sign up for free or login with your existing account.
4 reasons why Doctors love M3 India
  • Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs

  • Nonloggedininfinity icon
    Daily Quiz by specialty
  • Nonloggedinlock icon
    Paid Market Research Surveys
  • Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries
Sign-up / Log In
x
M3 app logo
Choose easy access to M3 India from your mobile!


M3 instruc arrow
Add M3 India to your Home screen
Tap  Chrome menu  and select "Add to Home screen" to pin the M3 India App to your Home screen
Okay