The media problem with medicine today: Dr. Soham D Bhaduri
M3 India Newsdesk Jul 08, 2019
This time too, like in every other, as soon as doctors went on strike against the attacks, a few media houses started crying that patients are suffering due to doctors’ irresponsibility – ignoring the genuine plight that brought doctors down to streets.
We just witnessed what was probably one of the greatest doctor agitations ever, as doctors from across the country joined hands in protest against the brutal attacks on some resident doctors in West Bengal. It was a sight to behold – not just because doctors from various corners of the nation stood together in solidarity and forced an ever apathetic administration to take notice of their long standing grievances, but also because it evoked the sympathy of a large section of the lay public which has always remained censorious of doctors and the medical profession, by and large.
While demand for a strong central law for punishing offenders of healthcare violence was gaining ground, I argued in one of my articles in a major newspaper that enforcement of already existing laws remains feeble, and that despite a new law, implementation will remain key along with making our medical malpractice system more responsive and swift.
However, the role of the media in and around this is bemusing. At first, an otherwise hypercritical, over-judgemental, and populist mainstream media appeared to be vocally sympathetic and supportive of the resident doctors’ cause. In probably what might have been motivated more by partisan political interests rather than considerations of fairness and justice, a large section of the media came down on the West Bengal government for being insensitive towards doctors’ demands, while expressing solidarity with the medical fraternity. It seemed as if the ruthless race among media houses for augmenting TRPs was at least temporarily forsworn. In less than a month, this expectation has come crashing down.
Personally and on the surface, I am aware of two such incidents. At the appalling outbreak of the so called Acute Encephalitis Syndrome (AES) in Bihar recently, which cost hundreds of lives mainly among under-nourished children, a reputed journalist of a popular TV news channel decided to barge into the ICU of SKMCH, Muzaffarpur and heckle the doctor and a nurse with all sorts of inapposite questions. In what seemed to be a deliberate attempt to catch eyeballs and tug the emotional heartstrings of less-informed masses – rather than an act of innocent foolishness – the concerned journalist appeared to blame the doctor for the poor state of patients, while failing to note that the hospital was having way more than 100 percent bed occupancy, which is an larger administrative fault rather than a medical fault. Similarly last week, a major English newspaper put the blame of a tribal boy being unable to get a surgery done due to alleged faulty paperwork on ‘insensitivity’ of doctors. I am sure the readers here have encountered many such other examples.
Politics and media have forever played foul with the doctor-patient relationship, not just in India but in many parts of the world. While numerous episodes of violence have been known to be utilised by political parties to score brownie points with voters, the high emotional content of a patient suffering due to lack of healthcare provides a fertile space for the mainstream media to play populist tunes to score TRPs. The possible consequences due to undermining of trust in the doctor-patient relationship are easily ignored, while blame is shifted to the easiest and the innocuous target: the doctor. This time too, like in every other, as soon as doctors went on strike against the attacks, a few media houses started crying that patients are suffering due to doctors’ irresponsibility – ignoring the genuine plight that brought doctors down to streets.
While doctors this time put up an exemplary display of unity, forcing the political circles to shed their conventional populist garb, I am afraid it has had little effect on the populist tendencies of the media. And I am of the conviction that this stands to undermine whatever of a positive perception and sympathy for doctors that the recent strikes created in lay people.
But what do we do here?
Like a law for punishing offenders and deterring violence, can we have a regulation to debar the media from entering high-pressure areas like the ICU? I think such an option is worth seriously contemplating. Media entry into such sensitive areas can seriously disrupt the operations meant to manage critically ill patients and be the foremost reason for deaths, the blame of which will likely, by default, fall upon the innocent doctor. It is only fair that places like ICU are kept from becoming the hub of anarchy.
But such stop gap measures, though much needed, will fail to address the bigger picture. The eventual solution lies in disciplining media houses into being fair and impartial in their reporting of healthcare issues – things for which they are unlikely to find sufficient incentives. It is therefore imperative for the medical fraternity to preserve and bolster its unity and accumulate enough clout to influence the mainstream media, so that a good section of it can be made to present the doctor’s side of the story through unbiased reporting to the general public. We, as doctors, need to wake up to the reality that simply asking and expecting politicians and the media to be unbiased and fair to us will be of no use at all, and we have to actively take matters of our and the patient’s interest in our own hands.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author's and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of M3 India.
Dr. Soham D. Bhaduri is Editor, The Indian Practitioner, a healthcare commentator, and a medical doctor based in Mumbai.
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries