Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales: Latest Management Guidelines by ESCMID
M3 India Newsdesk Dec 23, 2022
This ESCMID guideline article provides key updates to manage Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. The update focuses on the effectiveness of individual antibiotics and combination versus monotherapy.
Multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) are a matter of global concern. Enterobacterales have developed resistance mechanisms to carbapenems, leaving very few antibiotic options. The ESCMID guidelines provide key recommendations for managing Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE).
Choosing the antibiotic of choice for CRE
In cases with severe infections due to CRE, meropenem-vaborbactam or ceftazidime-avibactam (if active in vitro) is suggested.
Cefiderocol is conditionally recommended in patients with severe infections due to CRE-carrying metallo-β-lactamases (MBL) and/or resistance to all other antibiotics, including ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam.
In cases with non-severe infections due to CRE, considering antibiotic stewardship, an old antibiotic can be considered. As a good clinical practice, these antibiotics should be chosen from among the in vitro active on an individual basis and according to the source of infection.
In cases with non-severe complicated UTIs (cUTI), aminoglycosides are conditionally recommended. The use of plazomicin is suggested over tigecycline.
Tigecycline is not recommended for bloodstream infections (BSI) and hospital-acquired pneumonia/ ventilator-associated pneumonia (HAP/VAP). The use of high-dose tigecycline is conditionally recommended in patients with pneumonia.
Due to a lack of evidence, imipenem-relebactam and fosfomycin monotherapies are not recommended for CRE.
Combination therapy in CRE: What can be used
Combination therapy is not recommended in cases with CRE infections susceptible to and treated with:
- Ceftazidime-avibactam
- Meropenem-vaborbactam
- Cefiderocol
A combination of aztreonam and ceftazidime-avibactam can be used in:
- In patients with severe infections caused by CRE carrying metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) and/or
- In patients resistant to new antibiotic monotherapies
- Treatment with more than one drug active in vitro is conditionally recommended in
- Cases with severe infections caused by CRE susceptible in vitro only to polymyxins, aminoglycosides, tigecycline or fosfomycin
Or
- In the case of the non-availability of new β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLI)
The use of carbapenem-based combination therapy for CRE infections is not recommended. Exceptions include meropenem minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) ≤ 8 mg/L – In such cases, high-dose extended-infusion meropenem may be used as part of combination therapy if the new BLBLI are not used.
Considering antibiotic stewardship, the use of monotherapy (chosen from among the in vitro active old drugs) is suggested in patients with non-severe infections or among patients with low-risk infections. Monotherapy should be selected on an individual basis and according to the source of infection.
Click here to view part 1 of the series.
Disclaimer- The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of M3 India.
-
Exclusive Write-ups & Webinars by KOLs
-
Daily Quiz by specialty
-
Paid Market Research Surveys
-
Case discussions, News & Journals' summaries